Unimike.net The Lost City in the Endless Universe

If you watched Obama’s speech and think it is great ?  You might want to verfiy for the facts and the actions that have been done by clicking here.

For those statement that Obama said that he would support troops when he ACTUALLY voted against the $94.4 billion dollars funding for both wars.

Gas Relief ?   Maybe not .

Barack Obama Opposes Immediate Gas Tax Relief For American Families. Obama: “I think John McCain’s proposal for a three month tax holiday is a bad idea.” (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At Campaign Event, Blue Bell, PA, 4/21/08)

He wants to institute the windfall profit tax upon the oil companies similar to carter’s adminstration which have forced americans to suffer with the raising gas prices back in 1970s.

There are tons more facts and misleading claims on the page by clicking the link above!

McCain 2008!

I have came across a blog that Denny posts about the events that occured between two candidates who are McCain and Obama.  He shares very good articles and is very informative!  Go check it out at http://777denny.wordpress.com

Everywhere and everytime I read the political section…especially political blogs, I see people accuse McCain as McBush, Bush’s 3rd term and etc.  Guess what ?  He’s not bush’s 3rd term!  If he is really is Bush’s 3rd term then he would be continuing whatever Bush have left off.

Obama will be continuing whatever Bush have left off in the terms of ecomonics which means that Obama will be issuing more tax rebates when he feels its necessary.  Well the first tax rebate that was passed by Bush is not working…so why do we need much smaller rebate that is visioned by Obama if that card is already been Played by Bush….ah Obama is the Bush’s 3rd term.  McCain’s plan to improve the ecomony is not the tax rebate plan (surprise surprise!  Not so bush as you think ?)  McCain’s plan is to increase the dollar by making it stronger while drop the oil prices which means getting the out of control inflation in control!  In addition to improving the ecomony, McCain will cut the corportation taxes down to 25% from 35% which will simulate the job creatation in the corporation while Obama wants to increase the tax to the wealthy americans….so think about this.  If we increase the tax against the wealths especially for those of them who runs their own business, they will start laying off lower class americans to preserve the cash flow.  Its always cause and effect.  Obama have no plans to get the inflation in control….hmm….McCain plans to maintain the current tax rates in captail gains and dividends while Obama wants to raise those.  McCain is winner again.

Of course, we all want to end Iraq War now…but if we end it prematurely…we are throwing in the white towel do we really want that ?  For me, I think not that will show US as wimpy country!  Obama wants to start the withdrawal from Iraq….violence have gone down at Iraq right…so why throw in the towel we got it in control so we can help the Iraqis to establish their government.  Once they are established, we can bring our combat forces home while maintaining American PRESENTANCE at Iraq for 100 years.  Obama twisted the word by 100 years of war.. McCain never said it:

His latest remarks come in response to repeated attempts by Sen. Barack Obama and other Democrats to argue that McCain supports maintaining troops for a 100 year war in Iraq. Instead, McCain has repeatedly said on the trail during the past few weeks that he is talking about a long-term post-war military presence similar to the ones the U.S. has with South Korea, Japan and Germany–where the U.S. has maintained troops for more than 50 years.

Obama twisted McCain’s statement of 100 years in Iraq….oh who other leader twisted words too ??? oh Bush!!!!

Obama twisted the words of Republican John McCain, saying he has suggested “war” might “go on for another 100 years.” McCain expressly said otherwise. He said a 100-year presence would be acceptable in the absence of violence against U.S. troops, and later said “the war will be over soon.”

Oh there’s something shocking, Obama claims that he doesn’t like to accept donations from the Oil companies, while he secretly accepted donations from people who works in the oil industry.  Gee who used to work in Oil Industry ?   Oh he’s the current President.

So Aroniza have been electing him for more than 20 years as their state senator, if he is worse than Obama who only served for Illnois for only 3 years.  Tell me how because I don’t see McCain worse than Obama.  And a wild thought…..Obama’s middle name…”Hussien” and his last name is so close to “Osama”  We are still recovering from the damages from the 9/11 attacks, I still can not trust a guy who have the Muslim like names and have the terrorist connections as the Tennessee Democrat (same party gasp!) suggests.

Vote McCain ‘08!

Research before you link someone to Bush.

As the regular investor in the wall street, I am pledging my vote to McCain, why ? Because I strongly feel that he is the one that can serve super poor American like me who struggles to make the ends to meet regularly. How so ? Okay here’s the following list of his statements as follows:

–McCain’s action/statement on the Economy:

* Bailing out Bear Stearns necessary to protect economy. (Apr 2008)
* Key is to not to bail out homeowners who speculated. (Apr 2008)
* Things are tough now, but we’re better off than in 2000. (Jan 2008)
* May have to go further to fix the subprime lending situation. (Jan 2008)
* Recession is partly psychological and not inevitable. (Jan 2008)
* I’m well-versed in economics; I was at the Reagan Revolution. (Jan 2008)
* FactCheck: Said–then denied–he needed economics education. (Jan 2008)
* Impose some fiscal discipline to revive the economy. (Jan 2008)
* Will be able to reduce war costs & have a stable Middle East. (Jan 2008)
* Reform insurance to cover violent weather patterns. (Jan 2008)
* To avoid recession, stop out-of-control spending. (Jan 2008)
* Loss of economic strength leads to losing military strength. (Dec 2007)
* Republicans have forgotten how to control spending. (Nov 2007)
* AdWatch: Outrageous to spend $233M for bridge to nowhere. (Nov 2007)
* FactCheck:Bridge-to-Nowhere never built; would serve 200,000. (Nov 2007)
* FactCheck: Criticized “Woodstock museum,” but skipped vote. (Nov 2007)
* Congress spends money like a drunken sailor. (May 2007) (The Congress is Democrat controlled at this time *Added by the Blog author*)
* Veto all pork-barrel bills and announce pork spenders. (May 2007)
* Use veto power to reduce government spending. (Jan 2000)
* Distribute surplus: 23% tax cuts; 62% Social Security. (Jan 2000)
* $9B of pork in current budget bills; cut subsidies. (Oct 1999)
* For Balanced Budget Amend., & off-budget Social Security. (Jul 1999)
* List of budgetary spending priorities. (Jul 1998)
* Supports Balanced Budget Amendment. (Jul 1998)
* Apply surplus to Social Security, Medicare, tax cuts & debt. (Jul 1998)
* Voted YES on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)
* Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)
* Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget. (May 1997)
* Voted YES on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment. (Mar 1997)
* Maintain & enforce existing spending caps in the future. (Sep 1998)

as opposed to

–Obama’s action/statement on Economny:

* Can’t do anything at home with $12 billion a month on Iraq. (Feb 2008)
* Protect consumers with Credit Card Bill of Rights. (Feb 2008)
* More accountability in subprime mortgages. (Feb 2008)
* Bush stimulus plan leaves out seniors & unemployed. (Jan 2008)
* Voted against limiting credit to 30%, because 30% too high. (Jan 2008)
* Account for every single dollar for new proposed programs. (Jan 2008)
* Help the homeowners actually living in their homes. (Jan 2008)
* Bankruptcy bill pushed by banks &. (Jan 2008)
* Lack of an energy policy is a financial burden. (Jan 2008)
* Bush & GOP dug budget hole; need years to dig out. (Dec 2007)
* Save $150 billion in tax cuts for people who don’t need them. (Dec 2007)
* Take China “to the mat” about currency manipulation. (Dec 2007)
* Rejects free market vision of government. (Oct 2007)
* Regulate financial instruments to protect home mortgages. (Aug 2007)
* Government regulation needed for when markets fail. (Aug 2007)
* Return to PayGo: compensate for all new spending. (Oct 2006)
* Bush’s economic policies are not working. (May 2004)
* Supports federal programs to protect rural economy. (May 2004)
* Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs’ effectiveness. (Mar 2007)
* Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)
* Get minorities into home ownership & global marketplace. (Jan 2001)
* Require full disclosure about subprime mortgages. (Dec 2007)

McCain’s action/statements on Taxes/Tax Reform:

* Veto any tax increase; worst thing now is to raise taxes. (Feb 2008)
* 2001: tax package with spending restraint, against Bush cuts. (Feb 2008)
* Require a 3/5 majority vote in Congress to raise taxes. (Feb 2008)
* FactCheck: Against Bush tax cuts in 2003; for them in 2006. (Jan 2008)
* Romney raising fees a quarter-billion dollars is a tax hike. (Jan 2008)
* Opposed to the Bush tax cuts as spending got out of control. (Jan 2008)
* Supported Reagan tax cuts because matched by spending cuts. (Jan 2008)
* Reform the tax code that nobody trusts and believes in. (Dec 2007)
* We need a simpler, fairer tax code, but not FairTax. (Nov 2007)
* Tax system is fair; wealthy pay bulk of taxes. (Oct 2007)
* Won’t sign no-tax pledge; focus on cutting spending. (Sep 2007)
* Make tax reform commission & vote yes-or-no on outcome. (Aug 2007)
* FactCheck: Families spend $20B on tax prep, not $140B. (Aug 2007)
* Opposed Bush tax cuts, but must extend them now. (May 2007)
* New tax cuts account for contingencies and over-spending. (May 2007)
* Alternative minimum tax is eating Americans alive. (May 2007)
* Bush tax cuts fiscally reckless & favored rich;but keep them. (Apr 2007)
* Consistent on focusing tax cuts more toward middle class. (May 2002)
* Tax plan: $238B over 5 years; $500B over 10 years. (Feb 2000)
* Double child tax credit; add family incentives. (Feb 2000)
* “Balanced approach”, and starts a flat tax system. (Feb 2000)
* Reagan Republican: simplify taxes; cut waste. (Feb 2000)
* Big money interests fear closing loopholes. (Jan 2000)
* Remove charitable deduction; it only benefits rich. (Jan 2000)
* Replace employer-provided benefits with a tax cut. (Jan 2000)
* Middle-class tax cut: expand 15% tax bracket. (Jan 2000)
* Don’t promise tax cuts from future surpluses we may not have. (Jan 2000)
* 1st step to simplify taxes: close special interest loopholes. (Dec 1999)
* Supports flat tax; stop complexity by special interests. (Oct 1999)
* Keep lump-sum earned income tax credit. (Oct 1999)
* Cut marriage tax, inheritance tax, & earnings test. (Sep 1999)
* Taxes should be flatter, lower, and simpler. (Apr 1999)

Obama’s action/statements on Taxes/Tax Reform:

* No tax increase if earning under $250K; tax cuts under $75K. (Apr 2008)
* Raise capital gains tax for fairness, not for revenue. (Apr 2008)
* Tax cut for seniors and those making $75,000 a year or less. (Feb 2008)
* I’m not bashful about it: wealthy will pay more taxes. (Jan 2008) (This implies that Obama is for the tax increases “wealthy will pay more taxes.” hmmm….*this statement is added by the blog author*)
* Stimulus package: $500 tax cut, & Social Security supplement. (Jan 2008)
* Restore progressive tax; close loopholes; relief to seniors. (Oct 2007)
* Trillion dollar giveaway: the Paris Hilton Tax Break. (Oct 2007)
* Reduce Bush tax cuts to pay for health care & other programs. (Jun 2007)
* Estate tax only affects the wealthiest 1/2 of 1%. (Oct 2006)
* Specific tax relief for families making $75,000 or less now. (Jan 2006)
* Bush tax cuts help corporations but not middle class. (Jun 2004) (Alittle duh here ?  If we don’t give corportations some tax break, how can they employ the americans ? *Added by the Blog Author.)
* Tax incentives to create jobs at home instead of offshore. (Jun 2004)

Don’t buy the BS from the campigans if the records shows differently,  so Obama IS NOT THE ANSWER for the America unless you want to see another Great Depression because doubling the tax in stocks do have the possiblity to trigger the depression because it will make me to stop trading as well as another fellow investors expressed the same response.  McCain will take care of us as he have been serving for the AZ people for more than 20 years as their Senator while Obama only served 3 years for Illnois ?  That’s shows huge difference in experience.

**Those listings are taken from http://www.ontheissues.org ***

She tends to have her husband to defend for her…what kind of leader that is so weak that needs somebody else to stand up for the potential leader so often ?  That shows big weakness, that means that President Clintion will be assuming the presidency once again in the background as this pattern implies as the President Clinton have been defending her wife so often.  Hmm.  Do not vote Democrats!

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/11/clinton.bosnia/index.html

The fellow blogger talks about the Senator John McCain have been adcovate on the disability rights and that he had been served for Gallaudet’s Board of Trustee for 11 years while he was in Senate.  If you are still not sure who to vote for, you should check out that blogger’s entry.

John McCain for President 2008!

Let me start you off with a brief yet most exciting US history!! Her husband, Former President Bill Clinton unveiled the universal health care back in 1993 and he have appointed his wife who is now running for president to over see this committee. See that was more than 15 years ago and its not established and running ? What up with that ? So why would we want a leader who can not finish a weee simple leadership job that they were assigned to complete ? It can be found at here.

So how can she lead us out from Bush’s empire and flee us from the United Oil of America back into United States of America ?

To me, she is no different than our current president Bush with his millions of failed efforts! So why do we want another Bush ??

Think long and hard.

Is it me or the Congress is giving it in to President Bush ??? Approving the $70 Billion dollars more for the wasteful Iraq War ?? How fu!@#$ked up is that!? I thought we are going to commerce the partial troops withdrawal but issuing them extra $70 Billion Dollars implies very differently which is that the war will go on! The Congress of United States, are you deaf and blind ?? The Americans have spoken loud and clear that we frown at the War which where it is going right now and yet you are still writing new checks to President Bush to continue the directionless, pointless war ? Wake up and, stop slacking and get on the program! Also, get your priorities straight!!! Start with the social security reform for the starters, and you lazy lawmakers already knew that the social security is going to bankrupt and you are still throwing money away to President Bush ? Wake up and smell the coffee for crying out loud!!

My rant response to this article at http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/12/bush.war.funding/index.html?iref=mpstoryview

Wasteful Spending – Said by President Bush.

Wasteful ? How can it be wasteful if our Social Security is struggling to make their ends to meet as well as our American Schools are extremely underfunded and the NCLB (No Child Left Behind) is making very little or no impact to our education system as the federalized test scores from among of US students continues to drop from the day the NCLB law was passed!  How about insuring all those uninsured American children and you vetoed those bills ?  It appears that your oil empire is more important to you than serving the Americans, you will be sorry a$$!!!

The truth is that the wasteful spending is the freaking wars!!!! President Bush, yes you heard me right! You are wasting BILLIONS and BILLIONS of US Dollars on the pointless wars and you are crying for $50 Billion dollars more just to start the troops withdrawal ? Gimme Break!!! Mr. President, you have been asking for the extra war funding for like what ? 50th time for last 4 years. Also, how many times have you tried to reform the Social Security ? Probably only twice…..wasteful huh ? I think not since almost all of our domestic programs are extremely underfunded.  And, don’t forget that the tax dollars is NOT YOUR money, its the Americans money who paid in taxes!

A piece of advice, think before you speak, because you are bound to be caught.

US demands air passengers ask its permission to fly

If you’re not on the list, you’re not getting on

By Wendy M. Grossman ? More by this author

Published Friday 12th October 2007 13:18 GMT

Under new rules proposed by the Transport Security Administration (TSA) (pdf), all airline passengers would need advance permission before flying into, through, or over the United States regardless of citizenship or the airline’s national origin.

Currently, the Advanced Passenger Information System, operated by the Customs and Border Patrol, requires airlines to forward a list of passenger information no later than 15 minutes before flights from the US take off (international flights bound for the US have until 15 minutes after take-off). Planes are diverted if a passenger on board is on the no-fly list.

The new rules mean this information must be submitted 72 hours before departure. Only those given clearance will get a boarding pass. The TSA estimates that 90 to 93 per cent of all travel reservations are final by then.

The proposed rules require the following information for each passenger: full name, sex, date of birth, and redress number (assigned to passengers who use the Travel Redress Inquiry Program because they have been mistakenly placed on the no-fly list), and known traveller number (once there is a programme in place for registering known travellers whose backgrounds have been checked). Non-travellers entering secure areas, such as parents escorting children, will also need clearance.

The TSA held a public hearing in Washington DC on 20 September, which heard comments from both privacy advocates and airline industry representatives from Qantas, the Regional Airline Association, IATA, and the American Society of Travel Agents. The privacy advocates came from the American Civil Liberties Union and the Identity Project. All were negative.

The proposals should be withdrawn entirely, argued Edward Hasbrouck, author of The Practical Nomad and the leading expert on travel data privacy. “Obscured by the euphemistic language of ’screening’ is the fact that travellers would be required to get permission before they can travel.”

Hasbrouck submitted that requiring clearance in order to travel violates the US First Amendment right of assembly, the central claim in John Gilmore’s case against the US government over the requirement to show photo ID for domestic travel.

In addition, the TSA is required to study the impact of the proposals on small economic entities (such as sole traders). Finally, the TSA provides no way for individuals to tell whether their government-issued ID is actually required by law, opening the way for rampant identity theft.

ACLU’s Barry Steinhardt quoted press reports of 500,000 to 750,000 people on the watch list (of which the no-fly list is a subset). “If there are that many terrorists in the US, we’d all be dead.”

TSA representative Kip Hawley noted that the list has been carefully investigated and halved over the last year. “Half of grossly bloated is still bloated,” Steinhardt replied.

The airline industry representatives’ objections were largely logistical. They argued that the 60-day timeframe the TSA proposes to allow for implementation from the publication date of the final rules is much too short. They want a year to revamp many IT systems, especially, as the Qantas representative said, as no one will start until they’re sure there will be no further changes.

In addition, many were concerned about the impact on new, convenient and cash-saving technologies, such as checking in at home, or storing a boarding pass in a PDA.

One additional point, also raised by Hasbrouck: the data the TSA requires will be collected by the airlines who presumably will keep it for their own purposes – a “government-coerced informational windfall”, he called it.

The third parties who actually do much of the airline industry’s data processing, the Global Distribution Systems and Computer Reservations Systems, were missing from the hearing. ®

**Taken from http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/12/flying_into_data_hell**

How fucked up is that!? The more government control we have to suffer just trying to comply with the government the more hassle it gets the less fun the travel gets and they are slowly killing the one of the transportion sector which is the airport.

US Government, you need to really think this through, will it help the world enomony ? No ? Of course you are going to kill the airline industry and the tourism! Therefore, you need to chill out! Take some prozac for crying out loud!